• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@x..., www-rdf-interest@w...
• Date: 25 Feb 2000 06:20:57 -0500

Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...> writes:

> > Generally speaking, a complicated design is a bad design.
> 
> I'd like to see the mathematical proof for that one! Once again you
> are introducing value judgements.

Jeff's proof would be a statistical one, not a mathematical one.  His
argument, which would probably be born out by investigation, is that
all other things being the same a more complicated design is
significantly less likely to be implemented fully than a simpler
design.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: A certain difficulty
    • From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A certain difficulty
• Next by Date: Re: A certain difficulty
• Previous by thread: RE: A certain difficulty
• Next by thread: Re: A certain difficulty
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread