• From: "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@s...>
• To: <haustein@k...>, "XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 09:56:35 -0800

Stefan,

I'm glad you pursuing this. What I would reall like to see from Mr. Thompson
is a schema example using types/elements that can't be trivially recoded to
use a slightly modified element syntax alone. I understand the need for
primitive datatypes, but compound types are just abstract elements, like you
say.

My next question is: do we really need Content Models?


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • XML Schema WG changing gears (was Re: Schema concepts)
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• References:
  • Re: Schema concepts
    • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@k...>

• Prev by Date: [OFFTOPIC] Duplicate message and delay
• Next by Date: encoding converters?
• Previous by thread: Re: Schema concepts
• Next by thread: XML Schema WG changing gears (was Re: Schema concepts)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread