• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 23:42:57 -0500

At 10:10 PM 2/10/00 -0500, Murray Maloney wrote:
>It has long been 
>Commerce One's view that an interoperable XML Schema language is
>a prerequisite to interoperable e-commerce solutions.

I hope that we can find out during the Candidate Recommendation (or
possibly sooner) whether the size and scope of the XML Schema
specifications lead to a large number of less-than-completely-interoperable
functionality subsets.

I'm hoping that XML Schemas prove simple and efficient to implement, but
(based on my readings of the latest drafts), I can't say I'm optimistic.

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
http://www.simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
    • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@k...>

• References:
  • RE: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
    • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
  • RE: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
    • From: Murray Maloney <murray@m...>

• Prev by Date: Frontline report from the Desperate Fgrep Hacker
• Next by Date: Re: Grove diagram (was Re: The Power of Groves)
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
• Next by thread: Re: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread