• From: Jim Layer <JBLayer@n...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: 25 Feb 00 11:42:57 EST

David Megginson wrote:

> Basically, we tried to make SAX1 easy to implement and we tried to
> make it easy to use, but where there was a conflict, we almost always
> favoured the implementors over the users.  I know that sounds
> completely wrong, but it seems to work.  For a theoretical
> justification of this approach, see one of my most-quoted references
> 
>   http://www.naggum.no/worse-is-better.html

Hmmm... SAX-as-virus. Touche...
BTW, SAX2 Beta1 has "infected" Xerces-J V1.0.2 ;)
  
http://xml.apache.org/dist/

Regards,

Jim Layer

____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: SV: A certain difficulty
• Next by Date: External entities in WF documents
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by thread: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread