• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@x..., www-rdf-interest@w...
• Date: 24 Feb 2000 20:44:35 -0500

Jeff Sussna <jeff.sussna@q...> writes:

> Generally speaking, a complicated design is a bad design. I believe
> the frustration with RDF comes primarily from the casting of the
> model into XML syntax(es), not from the writing of the
> spec.

I disagree -- the XML syntax for RDF has too many annoying variations,
granted, but the main problem is that the underlying RDF data model is
much, much more complicated than the spec suggestions.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: A certain difficulty
    • From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN <champin@b...>

• References:
  • RE: A certain difficulty
    • From: Jeff Sussna <jeff.sussna@q...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
• Next by Date: Re: SAX2: XMLReaderFactory
• Previous by thread: RE: A certain difficulty
• Next by thread: Re: A certain difficulty
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread