Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Hi, > When looking at the first results of my tinkering the first > thing I noticed was that any subclass of protogé:Thing was > declared to be such. So my file full of my local concepts > has a pointer back to stanford as well as pointers back to > the RDFS concepts. > .... > (From http://www.w3.org/2000/calendar/clendar.rdfs which is not a serious > effort in any way - just a play with protege and full of junk) This link doesn't work (nor does ...calendar.rdfs or ...calender.rdfs) I'd like to see the project (though I think we've fixed the bug). > In fact the fact that from Protegé's point of view something is > a subclass of Thing is of course information-free. It should > therefore be omitted from the serialization. > I think it is now :-). I just looked over a couple of rdfs files generated by the current version and there's no mention of :THING. William Grosso -- William Grosso grosso@s... Phone 650-498-4255 http://www.smi.stanford.edu/people/grosso/ *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html ***************************************************************************
|
