[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • To: xml-dev@x...
  • Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 16:29:24 +0000

At 01:26 PM 2/10/00 +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...> writes:
>
>> I do, however, recall an analysis by Henry Thompson of the complete grove
>> diagram of a very simple XML file with 1-2 elements types and attributes
>> and including a DTD and it was surprisingly complex. I don't think it was
>> on this list - probably XML-SIG. Groves are not trivial.
>
>SGML, not XML, not that that matters much.  The picture is here:
>
>  http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/grove.html

Thanks Henry - I had just managed to find it (on XML-DEV). You beat me to it.

Would it be simpler in XML? Since - presumably - XML can have a simpler
property set maybe there would be fewer components in the diagram? 

	P.

>
>ht
>-- 
>  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
>          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
>     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
>	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
>		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
> 

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member