[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 10:28 AM 2/5/00 -0800, Terje Norderhaug wrote: >My proposal is NOT based on storing a combined namespace-name pair in a >single string. Instead, the string only consists of the local name. > >Given that each local name is internalized in its namespace, it becomes >possible to find the namespace of a local name without encoding the >namespace as part of the string. Wow. For a second I thought "what a brilliant idea, why didn't anyone think of it before". And maybe it is. Hm... is it a problem that you can have an element type and an attribute name in the same namespace, but they're really different names? E.g. <b:foo b:foo="32" /> the two b:foo's are really different things. -Tim
|

Cart



