• From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@k...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 20:05:34 +0100

David Megginson wrote:
> 
> If the implementors don't come up with anything significant, then it's
> probably better to throw out RDF altogether and start over.  I'm still
> tempted to design something RDF-like but much simpler and better
> documented, but so far (at the end of 2000-02) I think there's still a
> bit of hope for RDF: I'm not willing to split the market as long as
> there's a market to split, because the network effect is what we all
> really need.

David,

is what you have in mind better suitable for object serialization?
 
Best regards

Stefan

-- 
Stefan Haustein
University of Dortmund
Computer Science VIII
www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Re: A certain difficulty
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • SV: A certain difficulty
    • From: "Greg FitzPatrick" <gf@m...>
  • SV: A certain difficulty
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The RDF model *is* part of the problem
• Next by Date: Re: SAX2beta[2] ... implementations?
• Previous by thread: Re: SV: A certain difficulty - lack of action!
• Next by thread: RE: A certain difficulty
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread