• From: Dave Hollander <dmh@c...>
• To: Matthew Fuchs <matthew.fuchs@c...>, "'Bill la Forge'" <b.laforge@j...>, Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>, "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>, Dave Hollander <dmh@c...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:33:16 -0700

Sorry for the confusion. I intended the concept from the
view point of learning to use XML Schemas. I personally would
not like to see the parser industry design to a sub-set.
I agree that bifurcating the schema world now would be a
"bad" thing. 

As I talk with those who advocating "simpler schemas", I 
will have to be more careful with my words to make that
point clear.

Regards,
Dave Hollander


At 11:48 AM 2/11/00 -0800, Matthew Fuchs wrote:
>Standardizing such a thing makes me extremely nervous at this point.  The
>value of a standard is only that it is standard - xsdl hasn't even been
>finalized and we're already talking about bifurcating it. ...

__________________________________________________________
Dave Hollander
Director eCommerce Knowledge Management and Interoperability
CommerceNet
Co-chair W3C XML Schema Working Group
dmh@c... 
970-613-0605
__________________________________________________________

• References:
  • RE: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
    • From: Matthew Fuchs <matthew.fuchs@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: gold in that thar XML
• Next by Date: Re: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
• Next by thread: Re: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread