• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: james.anderson@m...
• Date: 09 Feb 2000 10:35:26 +0000

james anderson <james.anderson@m...> writes:

>  The concepts of "namespace as collection" and "membership in a
> collection" would appear to be present in the specification. If there
> were to ever be a revised draft, perhaps it would work out their
> implications and thereby avoid such unpleasantries as those in the
> schema proposal for the purpose of identifying "names in no namespace".

I agree this is a misleading phrase: the current working draft no
longer uses it, but speaks only of qualified and unqualified names.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

• References:
  • RE: XML Schema Question: default namespace misses attributes
    • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
  • Re: XML Schema Question: default namespace misses attributes
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Asynchronous message queue by SMTP&POP3
• Next by Date: Moderatorial: Indentification of quotes
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Schema Question: default namespace misses attributes
• Next by thread: RE: XML Schema Question: default namespace misses attributes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread