• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: "Hunter, David" <dhunter@M...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 19:18:36 -0600

Hunter, David wrote:
> 
> Although I'm only casually following this conversation, the above sounds
> earily like the grove discussions recently, which seem to have tapered off
> now.

Right.  These arguments are following the exact sequences that lead to 
groves. 

In sum:  nodes are nodes.  Properties are properties.  Tell me who 
gets to name the names and we'll get down to work.

It nevers gets better than Lisp.  Erik Naggum was right. 

"What was that thing about hats?"

len



***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: A certain difficulty
    • From: "Hunter, David" <dhunter@M...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Architectural Forms and XAF
• Next by Date: Re: Premature standardization considered harmful
• Previous by thread: RE: A certain difficulty
• Next by thread: RE: A certain difficulty
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread