Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Stefan Haustein wrote: > > Roger L.Costello wrote: > > > > Wouldn't it be better if, as is done in the XSLT spec, we don't use a > > default namespace and, instead, explicitly qualify all elements and > > attributes? Using such an approach, the above example can be recast as: Stefan Haustein wrote: (...) > However, when you define the specs for a concrete XML application, > you are free to ignore the difference by regarding both cases > equal. I do not like the idea to of having namespaces for attributes > very much because it seems to cause more confusion than benefit. > Personally, I would prefer if the attributes' namespace would always > default to the element's namespace. I am sorry, I intended to say: I do not like the idea of having NO namespace for attributes very much because it seems to cause more confusion than benefit. Personally, I would prefer if the attributes' namespace would always default to the element's namespace.
|
