• From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@c...>
• To: simonstl@s...
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:52:18 +0000 (GMT)

Simon St.Laurent writes:
 > As it is, we've got a closed standardization process that rarely focuses on
 > 'running software first'.

to be fair, some of them are pretty open. I don't think you could
claim that XSLT falls into the category of closed and unimplemented

> Anyone got a good CSS2 implementation?  

maybe its because no-one wants CSS, they they don't take its
implementation seriously?

 > XSL-FOs?
foul! FO  spec is unfinished.

 > (At least Amaya provides some real support for XHTML.)

you cannot seriously suggest that Amaya is useful for anything other
than the odd demonstration...

sebastian


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Alternatives to the W3C
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article.>
    • From: "Michael Champion" <Mike.Champion@s...>
  • Alternatives to the W3C
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Alternatives to the W3C
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The DOM: the realist and the implementer
• Next by Date: A Nice Chapter on SAX
• Previous by thread: Re: Alternatives to the W3C
• Next by thread: Re: Alternatives to the W3C
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread