• From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 15:56:28 -0000

> As I understand it, code with a *less* restrictive license can be
> included in a GPL'd program (i.e. SAX1, which is Public Domain) -- is
> that not always the case?

What are the problems with making SAX2 public domain ?

Thanks,

Richard.

PS. I've never understood all these various licenses so please ignore me if
this is a silly comment.
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
> David
>
> --
> David Megginson                 david@m...
>            http://www.megginson.com/
>
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
> Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on
CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
> To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
> unsubscribe xml-dev
> To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following
message;
> subscribe xml-dev-digest
> List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: SAX2: Which license?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
  • Re: SAX2: Which license?
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form
• Next by Date: Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX2: Which license?
• Next by thread: Re: SAX2: Which license?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread