• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: Stefan Haustein <stefan.haustein@t...>
• Date: 24 Jan 2000 09:19:50 +0000

Stefan Haustein <stefan.haustein@t...> writes:

> This principle would be violated if you "restrict" B 
> that a subelement required in A is not required in B. 
> In fact, that would not be a specialization or 
> restriction but a generalization. If I read the specs 
> right, you are not allowed to widen the [minOccurs...
> maxOccurs] interval, so the problem you address seems 
> not exist.

This analysis is correct.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Re: Derivation by Restriction
    • From: "Fabio Arciniegas A." <l-arcini@u...>
  • Re: Derivation by Restriction
    • From: Stefan Haustein <stefan.haustein@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Derivation by Restriction
• Next by Date: No Subject
• Previous by thread: Re: Derivation by Restriction
• Next by thread: W3C XML Signatures WD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread