• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:35:53 -0800

Miles Sabin wrote:
> 
> > > [snip: table mapping to intern'd Strings]
> > > Even tho' this only requires one java-intern for each
> > > distinct name it still provides plenty of opportunities for
> > > synchronization collisions.

So Miles, if you prefer the occasional synchronization issue
to the routine method invocation overhead, use a parser that
obliges you.  (Yes, I'm assuming SAX2 doesn't mandate any
interning, just exposes whether or not it's done.)

Though I daresay you'll find that the synchronization isn't
usually measurable, while your evidently preferred alternative
(lots of String.equals calls) will consistently show up as a
performance problem.  At least that's been the case when I've
made such measurements.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
    • From: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form
• Next by Date: Re: [XMLReader extends Parser???]
• Previous by thread: RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
• Next by thread: Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread