• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>,"xml-dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:52:42 -0500

At 02:01 PM 1/17/00 -0500, David Megginson wrote:

>I'd suggest, then, that the biggest barrier right now is not the fee
>but the whole committee structure and process of the W3C -- it's
>designed for companies that can afford to free up engineers to do
>standards work, and that tends to mean companies with revenues over
>US$5M/year.


Nah....I've got a budget a fraction of that, and we've got participants on
multiple groups. 
It Can Be Done. 

Ann
---
Just Released! - HTML BY Example
Now shipping -  Mastering XML 
Also in print:  Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials

Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education             http://www.hwg.org/services/classes





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Costs of the W3C
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Costs of the W3C
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Previous by thread: Re: Costs of the W3C
• Next by thread: Re: Costs of the W3C
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread