• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 10:47:01 -0800

And certainly an XML-DEV controversy, about "greater XML":

   Why aren't W3C processes really open?

;-)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Re: Great controversies of XML
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Great controversies of XML
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • Re: Great controversies of XML
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Draft of Paper: Using UML to Define XML DTDs
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Previous by thread: Re: Great controversies of XML
• Next by thread: RE: Great controversies of XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread