[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 24 Dec 99, at 13:58, Peter Murray-Rust wrote: > The lack of an API for an editor effectively makes it impossible for people > to develop a modular approach. Many of the "non-textual" DTD/schemas will > require specialist editors (my own interest is chemistry, but Math, > Geography/maps, SVG, etc are all similar). We need to be able to > concentrate *just* on the domain-specific parts of our subject, and not to > be concerned with general structural or technical editing. What do you need that you don't get from, for example, the DOM + the SVG DOM for editing SVG? I've been encouraging anyone who will listen to me to define their own DTD/schema-specific DOMs on top of the DOM for domain-specific work; MathML, SVG and SMIL are all doing this, for example, and I see no reason why others shouldn't as well. Lauren xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



