Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Thanks, Henry and Tim, for responding to my post. I'm very happy to hear about this advance. Tom Passin Henry S. Thompson wrote: > "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...> writes: > > > <snip/> > > > > The IETF won't bless an RFC until there are two independent implementations. > > I think this is the right kind of approach. Surely, Tim B's Lark > > implementation must have been a great help to the XML committee (I'm > > guessing, I don't really know anything about its role). There's nothing > > like trying to build to a spec to uncover its lack of clarity. > > The W3C has recently introduced a status of Candidate Recommendation > which we expect most RECs to pass through, which is specifically > designed for implementation feedback. XML Schema is certainly > intending to take advantage of this. > xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message unsubscribe xml-dev (or) unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
|
