• From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:30:43 -0600

Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> That's only if you think that IE5 counts as an XML browser, realistically.
> I don't. -Tim

Sad, because in the near to mid term, the dominant implementations will
more 
effectively define XML than XML1.0. So, vote with your feet if you 
must, but choose to lose.

OTOH, those non-browser web apps which use XML might also vote with 
their feet.

len



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Revised XLinks and XPointers chapters
• Next by Date: Re: XML for 3D geometry and objects
• Previous by thread: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Next by thread: Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread