• From: Norman Gray <norman@a...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:39:55 +0000 (GMT)

Greetings,

On 24 Jan 2000, Richard Tobin wrote:

> In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001241650060.24193-100000@g...>,
> Norman Gray <norman@a...> wrote:
> 
> >However: the definition of `unparsed entity' at the beginning of
> >section 4 of the XML spec states that an unparsed entity's contents
> >may not be XML.
> 
> Fortunately you have chosen the unintended meaning of the ambiguous
> wording.  When it says "may not be XML" it means "may be not XML".
> This is clarified in the errata:

Phew!  Thanks to Richard and others who responded.

Norman

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman Gray                        http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/
Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK     norman@a...


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Re: Auxiliary parses/subdocuments in XML
    • From: richard@c... (Richard Tobin)

• Prev by Date: What's this XML stuff anyway? (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Next by Date: Beginner question - What is a schema?
• Previous by thread: Re: Auxiliary parses/subdocuments in XML
• Next by thread: Beginner question - What is a schema?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread