• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: <martind@n...>, "David Brownell" <david-b@p...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 17:07:40 -0800

At 08:06 PM 1/22/00 -0500, Didier PH Martin wrote:
>If anyone has actually managed to get the DOM working in the
>XML+CSS environment, please let us know how. -Tim
>
>Didier replies:
>With the behavior draft we can do that if a CSS?? (3 maybe) includes a
>@script construct. In this case a full access to the DOM is feasible and
>thus it provides user interaction processing in addition to rendition.

Excuse me... this should not be necessary.  If a browser reads an 
XML document and displays it using CSS, the DOM should be there, it's
a fully documented interface.  No magic or sidestepping should be necessary.

And if a browser doesn't support XML+DOM, it doesn't support XML. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • MODERATION [was: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)]
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Geoworks and their patent
• Next by Date: Re: Geoworks and their patent
• Previous by thread: re: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Next by thread: Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread