• From: "Fabio Arciniegas A." <l-arcini@u...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:12:05 -0500

Hi all.
During the definition of a schema for instances product of Object
serialization, I begin to wonder about the implications of derivation
by restriction in XML: Schema when used with OO apps...

Is derivation by restriction necessary/desirable? could anyone
please explain the need behind it a bit? Is D by R a "threat" to
the conformance[1] principle when using schema to define object
hierarchies? 

just oblique thoughts... :) comments?

Fabio


[1] loosely put, the traditional conformance principle in OO states: If B
inherits from A, B can be used wherever A can be used.

--
Fabio Arciniegas A.		        Viaduct Technologies, Inc.
fabio@v...			         Software Engineer
Interests: XML, Wittgenstein and just about everything in between.
Oblique Strategy of the day: "Feed the recording back out of the medium"

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Derivation by Restriction
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: Alternatives to the W3C
• Next by Date: RE: XML for 3D geometry and objects
• Previous by thread: RE: VCRs and the Web
• Next by thread: Re: Derivation by Restriction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread