• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Ray Waldin <rwaldin@p...>, xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 16:57:39 -0800

At 04:48 PM 1/6/00 -0800, Ray Waldin wrote:
>  <html:a href="foo" html:href="bar"/> 
>
>This element must be considered well-formed from the standpoint of XML
>1.0 + Namespaces in order to allow #3 at the application level, no?  And
>furthermore, applications wanting to live in #1 have to do extra work
>for each and every attribute to ensure that documents in #3 are in the
>subset that is universe #1.  Yikes!

That's correct.  Apps can't rely on a generic XML or namespace processor
to raise an error on this.  If they want to do so, they have to do the
work themselves.  But the alternative - never allowing this to happen - 
seemed even more unattractive. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace?
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace?
• Next by Date: FW: [techspace] Re: Questions related to XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace?
• Next by thread: Re: Namespace question: Do attributes inherit the element's namespace?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread