• From: "Hunter, David" <dhunter@M...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 14:57:33 -0500

From: Bob Kline [mailto:bkline@r...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 1:58 PM

> Boy, it's certainly hard to keep up with all the flux in this 
> business!
> Are you saying that XQL is no longer a candidate for the syntax to be
> adopted by the XML Query Language WG?

I'm not sure about that at all.  All I know is that the current MSXML uses a
querying language which Microsoft says is based on the XQL proposal[1], and
that the new parser will be using XPath instead.

I get the impression that XPath replaces XQL, but admit to not following
either of the specs closely enough to be able to answer with authority...

[1] http://www.w3.org/TandS/QL/QL98/pp/xql.html

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Re: Geoworks and their patent
• Next by Date: About xlink tools
• Previous by thread: RE: Querying the DOM using XPath
• Next by thread: RE: Querying the DOM using XPath
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread