• From: dt@g... (Dennis Thrysoe - GeoGrafik A/S)
• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:20:49 +0100

Hi,

I am standing here with a legacy issue. A system was designed to be flexible
be changing the "dataroot" element.

This implies changing the documentroot element's defenition:

<!ELEMENT DOCROOT (A)>

or sometimes

<!ELEMENT DOCROOT (B)>

I need some help arguing against this practive, as I feel it is against the
spirit of XML and declarative documents. Does anybody know of some
litterature or a discussion of this anywhere?

TIA,

-dennis


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Redecleration of Element
    • From: "Brandt Dainow" <bd@i...>

• References:
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: "Michael Champion" <Mike.Champion@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: quotes in canonical forms
• Next by Date: No Subject
• Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Next by thread: RE: Redecleration of Element
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread