• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: David Brownell <david-b@p...>, Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@c...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:37:42 -0800

At 11:23 AM 1/17/00 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>> foul! FO  spec is unfinished.
>
>Actually, perhaps that means it's right on the mark.  It's
>better to have code (such as FOP? ;-) implementing drafts,
>and turning up bugs therein, than to wait till any sort of
>"Candidate REC" stage to start such work.

And I'm happy to report that there is an implementation in place,
and being madly extended as we write, in the Apache project (see
http://xml.apache.org).   Any others? -Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Alternatives to the W3C
    • From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Previous by thread: RE: Alternatives to the W3C
• Next by thread: Re: Alternatives to the W3C
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread