[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • To: Eliot Kimber <drmacro@d...>
  • Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 20:45:16 -0800

At 10:36 PM 1/30/00 -0600, Eliot Kimber wrote:

>> But at this point in history it seems obvious that of
>> the 3 models of work we have before us (ISO, IETF, W3C), none can be
>> said to have been shown to be either triumphant or bankrupt, based
>> on results.  The most likely conclusion is that they excel in different
>> problem domains.
>
>I want to second this 

And for those who don't know, Eliot's been way deep into two of 'em.
Anyone here been around all three? -T.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions and unsubscriptions
are  now ***CLOSED*** in preparation for list transfer to OASIS.



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member