• From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• To: Miles Sabin <msabin@c...>, "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:55:49 -0800 (PST)

Of course that data is from April 1999. Presumably, IE5's share
has increased since then? 

I would guess you have to pay to get the up-to-date statistics.

Jim

--- Miles Sabin <msabin@c...> wrote:
> Like, for example, the fact that they're the stats for a
> _single_ site. StatMarket, now unfortunately a paid for
> service,
> has much broader coverage. See,
> 
> http://statmarket.com/html/sample_browsers.html
> 
> which shows that although Microsoft is well in the lead, IE5
> only has an 8.3% share.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Miles
> 
> -- 
> Miles Sabin                       Cromwell Media
> Internet Systems Architect        5/6 Glenthorne Mews
> +44 (0)20 8817 4030               London, W6 0LJ, England
> msabin@c...         
> http://www.cromwellmedia.com/
> 
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post,
> mailto:xml-dev@i...
> Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or
> CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
> Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
> unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
> unsubscribe xml-dev
> your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address
> 
> Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation
> for transfer to OASIS.
> 
> 

=====
Jim Ancona                           jim@a...
scarhill@y...                    jim.ancona@g...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Prev by Date: Robert Burns works available as XML
• Next by Date: RE: Alternatives to the W3C
• Previous by thread: Re: Alternatives to the W3C
• Next by thread: Re: Alternatives to the W3C
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread