Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> It's not. See eg. > http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/stl/faq.htm#Q4 I believe this problem is due to Microsoft's basic_string being a reference-counting implementation. I've seen problems with this myself. > Complaints about this state of the Standard C++ library, are met with > responses on the line of "MSVC++ is not a standard C++ compiler. It's > a Windows compiler". > Quite amazing, really. Indeed, but it *is* possible to write portable code with MSVC++. It just depends on how much Microsoft stuff you drag into your build. One thing you might try is SGI's implementation of the STL (which includes their own version of std::string). I've been using this for years with much success. Download it at http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL. Alex Stepanov works on it at SGI, so you know it's good. > Yes. That wasn't my problem. My problem was that std::iostreams are > incompatible with Standards<ToolKit> (a failing of Standards<ToolKit>, I personally don't use MS's iostreams. They are about 6-10 times slower than good ole' stdio, so I wrote my own basic IO streams classes that simply wrap around a FILE *. Much better. -Paul -- Paul Miller - stele@f... xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
