Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Sebastien Sahuc wrote: > > > Michael Fuller wrote : > > But having taken a look at SAX2, not much seems to be wrong with it. > > *That* trend needs to be stepped on, and quickly, before it > > gets out of hand. > > Completely agree with it. And why not focus on SAX2 for both Java and > C++ as someone has already pointed out ? Just a thought: why not take a leaf out of the DOM's book and write the canonical version of the SAX interfaces in a language-neutral format like IDL? That way, bindings to a number of languages (including, but not limited to, C++ and Java) can be trivially derived by using the appropriate IDL-to-whatever converter. Vil. -- Vilya Harvey <vilya@n...> Wilkinson House Mob: +44 961 106 505 Computational Mathematics Group Jordan Hill Road Wk: +44 1865 511 245 NAG Limited Oxford UK OX2 8DR Fax: +44 1865 311 205 xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
