• From: Sebastien Sahuc <ssahuc@i...>
• To: Michael Fuller <msf@m...>, David Megginson <david@m...>
• Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 09:59:33 +0100

> Michael Fuller wrote :
> But having taken a look at SAX2, not much seems to be wrong with it.
> *That* trend needs to be stepped on, and quickly, before it 
> gets out of hand.

Completely agree with it. And why not focus on SAX2 for both Java and
C++ as someone has already pointed out ?

Sebastien


> 
> Michael
> ____________________________________________
> http://www.mds.rmit.edu.au/~msf/
> Multimedia Databases Group, RMIT, Australia.
> 
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, 
> mailto:xml-dev@i...
> Archived as: 
> http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on 
> CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
> To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
> unsubscribe xml-dev
> To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the 
> following message;
> subscribe xml-dev-digest
> List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
> 

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: simple XML for C++ application data-file I/O
• Next by Date: Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
• Previous by thread: RE: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
• Next by thread: FYI: YML: A Grand Unification of SAX and DOM? (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread