[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • To: David Megginson <david@m...>, XMLDev list <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 09:29:18 -0800

At 09:54 AM 12/15/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>I've done a lot of thinking about how we
>can make SAX2 Namespace processing both efficient and
>backwards-compatible.

I'm not sure backwards-compatible is really a good idea.  The 
namespace-sensitive and namespace-oblivious views of a chunk of XML
are just deeply, totally, massively incompatible, and it seems wrong
to try to paper that over.  I also don't think it's worth investing
any effort at all in accomodating XML documents that use colons in names
but aren't namespace-aware, given the explicit warnings against doing
this in the XML 1.0 spec.

So I think it would be cleaner to deal with the fact that names can have
two parts, and not kludge them together with {} marks.  -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member