• From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 14 Dec 1999 14:22:13 +0100

>>>>> John Aldridge <john.aldridge@i...>:

> Of course, you don't have to store the strings in your data
> structures in the same format as they are passed to you from SAX.

Well, the whole idea about using SAX was that we build the data
structures we'll finally use...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by Date: Xpath and DOM
• Previous by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by thread: How "final" is the new proposed recommendation for XHTML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread