• From: roddey@u...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 12:36:03 -0700

>> 11) The class names (since we can't afford to use C++ namespaces) should
be
>> expanded to include a SAX prefix to avoid clashes. So SAXParser and
>> SAXLocator and SAXAttributeList and so on.
>
>Is it true that C++ namespaces are still a problem on any platform?  I
>know that they actually do work under Windows, and the newer EGCS/GCC
>have supported them for a while for all *nix variants (including
>Linux) -- is it the Mac that doesn't have a proper C++ compiler yet?

Unfortunately, a number of the compilers supported by XML4C have no
namespace support, no bool support, limited template support, no mutable
member support, etc...

----------------------------------------
Dean Roddey
Software Weenie
IBM Center for Java Technology - Silicon Valley
roddey@u...



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by Date: Java a standard? not necessarily...
• Previous by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread