• From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 06 Dec 1999 14:59:29 +0100

* James Clark
| 
| Unfortunately wchar_t isn't guaranteed to be UTF-16.  Some platforms
| make it 32-bits.

* Steinar Bang
| 
| Yep!  So I've heard.
| 
| Do you have a list of the ones that does this?

gcc 2.95 on Linux does, at least. I don't know what it does on other
platforms. 
 
--Lars M.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX/C++: UTF-8 v UTF-16
    • From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>

• References:
  • SAX/C++: C++-specific design principles
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: SAX/C++: UTF-8 v UTF-16
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: SAX/C++: UTF-8 v UTF-16
    • From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>
  • Re: SAX/C++: UTF-8 v UTF-16
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: SAX/C++: UTF-8 v UTF-16
    • From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: simple XML for C++ application data-file I/O
• Next by Date: Re: SAX/C++: Changes for C++
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX/C++: UTF-8 v UTF-16
• Next by thread: Re: SAX/C++: UTF-8 v UTF-16
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread