• From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@h...>
• To: "'xml-dev@i...'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 12:14:50 -0700

Erlend Xverby [Erlend.Overby@u...] wrote

>>What we don't need from the SGML standard:
>> - SGML Declaration
>> - Character entities
>> - Minimisation
>> - The "&" construct

It looks like the XML Schema group is trying to add back the & construct.
If you have a compelling justification for continued suppression, please
rant long and loud.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: SGML the next big thing?
    • From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@s...>

• Prev by Date: FYI: YML: A Grand Unification of SAX and DOM? (fwd)
• Next by Date: Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
• Previous by thread: Re: SGML the next big thing?
• Next by thread: RE: SGML the next big thing?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread