• From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 07 Dec 1999 08:29:54 +0100

>>>>> Paul Miller <stele@f...>:

>> - use C++ exceptions

> I vote for C++ exceptions. That is why they are there.

Personally I think that C++ exceptions should only be used to signal
critical situations for the future execution of the program, not as a
normal matter of program flow control.

However, I think the ErrorHandler is a good idea, and have no problems 
with exceptions being thrown for the cases where one haven defined and 
registered an ErrorHandler.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: SAX/C++: C++-specific design principles
    • From: "Mark D. Anderson" <mda@d...>
  • Re: SAX/C++: C++-specific design principles
    • From: Paul Miller <stele@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX/C++: C++-specific design principles
• Next by Date: Re: GUI XML doc authoring tools
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX/C++: C++-specific design principles
• Next by thread: Re: SAX/C++: C++-specific design principles
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread