• From: "Hill, Les" <lhill@e...>
• To: 'Richard Anderson' <rja@a...>, David Megginson <david@m...>, XMLDev list <xml-dev-digest@i...>
• Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:12:23 -0500

Richard Anderson writes:
> Provided we just have a class that represents an exception, 
> which is passed
> via a callback and doesnt depend on the usual java/C++ 
> throw() mechanisms
> I'll be happy.

Gee, I guess I'd be unhappy :)  The ability to catch an exception in place
and continue as appropriate is worth losing direct API mappings to older
languages.

Regards,

Les Hill
Senior Architect
Excelergy

=======================================================
Excelergy is hiring Java/C++ XML developers, all levels
   send resume (and mention me :) to jobs@e...
=======================================================

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException?
• Next by Date: Re: SAX2: Exceptions/C++
• Previous by thread: RE: SAX2: DeclHandler
• Next by thread: SAX2: Renaming DTDHandler
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread