[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Stefan Haustein <stefan.haustein@t...>
  • To: David Megginson <david@m...>, "xml-dev@i..." <xml-dev@i...>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:22:15 +0100

> > - WBXML adds some properitary extensions. For that reason, I added an
> >   interface "WapExtensionHandler". Can that interface or a similar one
> >   be included in org.xml.sax.wap? Who cares about extensions of
> >   org.xml.sax? Unfortunally, the ugly extensions cannot be ignored
> >   since they are alread used in the WML definintions.
> 
> The extensions should go in a different package, such as org.wap.sax.

what about org.xml.wap? Or org.xml.swx (simple access to WAP binary
xml)?
org.wap is owned by an apple user group "washington apple pi". I am also 
not willing to spend 27000 USD in order to become a member of the wap 
forum (www.wapforum.org, similar to org.xml.sax vs. org.w3.sax? :-)

All the best,

Stefan

-- 
KJAVA AWT project: www.trantor.de/kawt
SAX-based access to WBXML and WML: www.trantor.de/wbxml

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member