[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> > - WBXML adds some properitary extensions. For that reason, I added an > > interface "WapExtensionHandler". Can that interface or a similar one > > be included in org.xml.sax.wap? Who cares about extensions of > > org.xml.sax? Unfortunally, the ugly extensions cannot be ignored > > since they are alread used in the WML definintions. > > The extensions should go in a different package, such as org.wap.sax. what about org.xml.wap? Or org.xml.swx (simple access to WAP binary xml)? org.wap is owned by an apple user group "washington apple pi". I am also not willing to spend 27000 USD in order to become a member of the wap forum (www.wapforum.org, similar to org.xml.sax vs. org.w3.sax? :-) All the best, Stefan -- KJAVA AWT project: www.trantor.de/kawt SAX-based access to WBXML and WML: www.trantor.de/wbxml xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|

Cart



