• From: Toby Speight <Toby.Speight@s...>
• To: "XML developers' list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: 07 Dec 1999 17:25:35 +0000

Lars> Lars Marius Garshol <URL:mailto:larsga@g...>

0> In article <m37liqad77.fsf@i...>, Lars wrote:

Lars> The only application I see for this sort of thing is to be able
Lars> to work around XML syntax rules,

I see a demand for parsing a document with SAX, but using some
start-tags to switch to building DOM (or DOM-like) objects, returning
to stream-oriented processing afterwards.  Perhaps you have a large
"set" or "list", and you know that the members of that collection can
be processed independently - why waste memory on a complete DOM for
that?

Lars> but once you do that your document is no longer an XML document
Lars> and you shouldn't pretend that it is, not even to yourself.

This bit I agree with.

-- 


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: nestable C/C++ XML parser?
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>

• References:
  • nestable C/C++ XML parser?
    • From: Paul Miller <stele@f...>
  • Re: nestable C/C++ XML parser?
    • From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: GUI XML doc authoring tools
• Next by Date: RE: A question on nomenclature
• Previous by thread: Re: nestable C/C++ XML parser?
• Next by thread: Re: nestable C/C++ XML parser?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread