• From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 03 Dec 1999 10:09:31 +0100

>>>>> David Megginson <david@m...>:

> "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...> writes:
>> I wouldn't consider RDF at the same level as CORBA, but perhaps part
>> of an overall solution.

> Though I'm the one that brought CORBA into the discussion, I think
> that a better comparison would probably be XMI, since CORBA is a
> protocol rather than a format.

<pedantic mode>
CORBA is a standard (or set of standards), for creating and using
distributed objects, and consisting of formats and protocols.
IIOP/GIOP would be a protocol, and so would the IDL interfaces
of the CORBA Services, if you stretch the concept.  IDL is definitely
a format, and I don't know how to categorize the different
IDL language bindings as either.
</pedantic mode>

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Some questions
    • From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@k...>
  • Re: Some questions
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by Date: Re: Object-oriented serialization (Was Re: Some questions)
• Previous by thread: Re: Some questions
• Next by thread: RE: Some questions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread