Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Clark C. Evans writes:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 1999 uche.ogbuji@f... wrote:
> > I think that though the prefix is maintained for convenience, it should _not_
> > be considered part of the name in any comparison at the semantic level.
> >
> > So, in short, I don't see a problem with
> > {"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml", "a", ""} ==
> > {"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml", "a", "html"}. It's a very
> > well-documented consequence of XML Namespaces 1.0, and users
> > should be aware of it.
>
> Just testing edge cases...
>
> {"","a",""} != {"","a","html"}
> and {"","a",""} == {"","a",""}
As I understood it, the suggestion was that
{"", "a", ""} == {"", "a", "html"}
To tell the truth, I am not comfortable with either alternative, and
that's why I don't want to create a Name class.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@m...
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
