• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 20:01:15 -0800

At 05:15 PM 12/27/99 -0500, Roger Costello wrote:
>2. The namespace spec clearly indicates that there is
>no guarantee that there is anything at the URL referenced
>by a namespace.  However, with XML Schemas, it seems
>that the namespace referenced in an XML instance document
>must necessarily reference an XML Schema.  Is this a violation
>of the namespace spec

I haven't read a recent schema draft, but if it says what you say it says,
then in my opinion that would be an egregious design error.  It is of course 
not a violation of the namespace spec, but I'm beginning to think that we 
should have written into the spec an express prohibition against land-grab 
attempts on the address function of the namespace name.  The notion that a
single URL can address the One True Schema Which Will Meet All Needs is 
demonstrably, empirically, absolutely wrong.  -T.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Wish lists for the Holidays
• Next by Date: RE: (Many) XML Schema Questions
• Previous by thread: (Many) XML Schema Questions
• Next by thread: RE: (Many) XML Schema Questions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread