• From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 12:36:36 -0800

Clark Evans asks whether there is ongoing work to introduce a new form of
Processing Instruction.  I am not aware of any such work, but perhaps others
are.

In any case, I am not attempting to debate the merits of the namespaces
design, but to achieve a precondition of reasonable debate, namely an
understanding of what the specification actually does and does not say.

I also recommend reading some some other posings on this subject,
particularly those of Tim Bray, Jon Bosak and David Megginson.

Best wishes,
Andrew Layman

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Why not PIs for namespace declarations?
• Next by Date: RE: attribute values as qnames?
• Previous by thread: RE: Why not PIs for namespace declarations?
• Next by thread: Re: Why not PIs for namespace declarations?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread