• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: Don Park <donpark@d...>
• Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 12:26:21 -0800

Don Park wrote:
> 
> Well, I find it rather counter-intuitive.

That makes _at least_ two of us ... ;-)

With both Tim and Andrew posting on this thread ... perhaps
one of them could provide some of the use cases that were
proposed where 

	<foo:a foo:href="bar">
	<foo:a href="bar">

should NOT be equivalent?  Lacking such use cases, I'm sure
Don and I aren't the only ones who will forever remain puzzled.

I noticed the latest version of the DOM L2 spec had to have a
specific warning on this issue, which suggests something.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: The per-element-type namespace partition
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: &eacute
• Next by Date: Re: SAX2: Exceptions
• Previous by thread: RE: The per-element-type namespace partition
• Next by thread: RE: The per-element-type namespace partition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread