Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
>>>>> "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>:
> At 01:06 PM 12/15/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>>> So I think it would be cleaner to deal with the fact that names can have
>>> two parts, and not kludge them together with {} marks. -Tim
>> ....
>> We talked about this a few months ago, but I'd be happy to hear what
>> people think now.
> I'm afraid I think this is a hideous idea, and that's an understatement.
> Even apart from code bloat - having to deal with two parts of a name means
> twice as much code every place the name matters - I'm really not sure I
> like the logic behind this approach.
It would fit my model well, I think. I would dispatch to the
appropriate DocumentHandler, based on the namespace.
But what if the handling of stuff from different namespaces is
intermingled...? Hm...
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
