• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>
• Date: 06 Dec 1999 08:40:29 -0500

Steinar Bang <sb@m...> writes:

> >>>>> David Megginson <david@m...>:
> 
> > Actually, I don't see any strong argument not to provide empty inline
> > implementations for the handler callbacks:
> 
> Inlined virtuals will cause an instantiation of the vtable and the
> function bodies in _every_ compilation unit the header file is
> included into (ref. Scott Meyers "More Effective C++", Item 24 pp
> 118).
> 
> This is a size cost that can be easily avoided.

Thanks -- this is the kind of information I was looking for.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • SAX/C++: First interface draft
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
    • From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
• Next by Date: Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
• Next by thread: Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread